Search This Blog

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Police Misconduct towards Mentally Ill



Police Misconduct towards Mentally Ill

By Maggie Patch 


Police are the good guys…at least that is what we have all been told; however, this is not always the case. Many police have been reported to have performed some sort of misconduct. In fact, statistics show that “ 1 out of  every 116.4 officers allegedly engaged in misconduct” and the most common type of misconduct reported is brutality, or excessive use of force. 



However, more concerning than this is how they handle situations with the mentally ill. There have been many cases where police officers kill or beat up the mentally ill. One such case is the death of Robert Ethan Saylor, a 26 year old down syndrome man. On January 12 of 2013, Saylor was watching ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ at a Fredrick movie theater with an aide. When the movie ended Saylor wished to view it again so he remained in the theater. An employee attempted to get Saylor to either leave or buy another ticket. Unable to do so the employee called three “off-duty Frederick County sheriff’s deputies who were working a security job at the Westview Promenade shopping center”. The employee told them that Saylor either “needed to buy another ticket or be removed.” 
            Saylor was known for his love of the police and his interest in the work they did. He often called them to ask questions or just talk to the officers. The people who came to the theater, however, did not look like police officers because they were out of uniform. When they tried to get him to leave he resisted, but was finally restrained with “three sets of handcuffs linked together” and was escorted out. Somehow, along the way, Saylor ended up of the ground and “began showing signs of medical distress”. Shortly after that he was pronounced dead of asphyxia. He died while in the care of these three officers, yet the only punishment so far was their suspension, a whole month later.

 


Another incident where the police handled a situation with a mentally ill person occurred on July 1 of 2012. Milton Hall, a 49 year old with mental disabilities “called the police following an argument with a convenience store clerk.” Milton moved out to the parking lot which is where he was when the police arrived. He had a knife on him when the six officers appeared. They repeatedly asked him to put the knife down. 
            According to his mother, Milton was a “homeless…civil rights activist, [who] received Social Security disability payments for mental illness and had lived in the area for 35 years” and all the police knew Milton. If they all knew Milton, then they must have known that he had a mental illness that impeded him from thinking clearly and processing information the way most people do. Yet, when Milton did not drop the knife that he was holding and took a step back the six officers opened fire, shooting Milton 46 times. A witness described it as a “firing squad dressed in police uniforms.” “''All of a sudden, pow, pow, pow, pow, pow...and he drops,' said Anthony Baber”. 

Video and information

            In both cases the victims obviously have mental disabilities. In Saylor’s case, even if the police had not known him, it is plain to see that he had some sort of disability. Milton Hall was well known by the police, and even if they had not known him, it was clear that something was not from the way he was talking in the video. Yet, in both cases the two were treated without care considering their disabilities and both paid the price for the officers misconduct and brutality with their lives. Every police officer should be trained how to deal with those with mental disabilities and how to handle them when they are agitated. 
            The abuse of power that these police officers show as well as their rash, uncaring judgment hits close to home for me. I have a down syndrome brother who loves to go to the theater and occasionally goes with his friend. My brother, like Saylor, likes to watch movies several times because he enjoys them so much. It would not be a surprise if he would want to stay to watch a movie again and he has a stubborn streak when there is something that he wants. If he could not be swayed would the employee call the police? Would the Saylor incident repeat itself with my brother the victim? I am not the only one with these concerns and the belief that the police should have a training course in order to prepare themselves for any incidents like the Saylor and Milton incidents. 



Do tattoos have a negative impact on your future career?



Do tattoos have a negative impact on your future career?
By Tayler Fought

There has been a huge increase in the popularity of tattoos and the desire to want them have increased as well however, as it increases a certain question arises to the more clever and determined minds: Will this affect a possible career someday? It’s unfortunate to say but, in some cases, the answer is yes it will. You can/will be turned down from a major company because of tattoos. There are certain companies that have a strict policy against any visible tattoos no matter what the meaning behind it is. But this could be because most of these types of companies are the ones that deal with the public.

When Human Resource managers were questioned about the hiring a possible employee with visible tattoos versus a possible employee with no visible tattoos, the majority of the HR would choose the more clean cut applicant with no visible tattoos.

After reading an article called “Buisness Tips”, it shows that tattoos have an interesting background.. 
1850 - 1900 - Tattoos used to be the bastion of carnival freak shows, with people flocking to the circus to see the amazing tattooed Lady.
 
1900 - 1950 - Tattoos in the early 20th century indicated a Sailor or Marine.  In these cases, they did not have any social stigma, except that tattoos were generally indicative of enlisted men.  Few Navy or Marine officers dared to draw on their body.
 
1950 - 1960 - In the early 1950's, tattoos became popular with the criminal element, mostly outlaw bikers, social outcasts and the mentally ill.  It was during this time tattoos took on a more ominous reputation.
 
1960 - 1990 - This was the age of "prison tats" where having a tattoo indicated to some people that you were a tough, ignorant, convicted felon.
 
1990-2008 - Today we see hordes of low-class young people drawing on themselves with free abandon, (almost 30% of people in the 1980's).  These people do not understand that a tattoo may effectively prohibit them from pursuing a professional career, regardless of their other qualifications.
The author of this article must have a biasd opinion because it seems as if he doesn’t approve of tattoos.
 Smaller businesses are more lenient with tattoos so , visible tattoos are usually more accepted, due to the more informal surrounding and a friendlier environment.

Though the first amendment of the Constitution says citizens have the freedom of expression however, companies still have a right to ban and turn down employees with tattoos in the workplace. Companies that ban them disregard the quality of work the employee could bring for their company.  Most companies do believe that people with visible tattoos can have a negative impact on the company.

Works Cited